The REAL purpose is to hopefully
get merle recognized as a pattern option so they will not be registered
as roans.
There have ALREADY been
too many cases of people buying a merle thinking it was roan.
If there is NO WAY to distinguish
between the two SOON on AKC papers, we are headed for some REAL problems.
Merle breeding is really
in it's infancy.
We keep up the way we are,
six years from now, we are going to be facing a disaster and not only will
ASC have the sables DQ'd, roan will
go right along with it because
no one will legitimately know if a roan is indeed a roan and not a merle.
Look what has happened to
the sable- do we want that happening with roan, too???
And AKC would not nullify
all past merles in the first place.
If it were proven without
a doubt that merle is from an outside gene, ASC would make the decision
what to do, not AKC.
If they decided to not acknowledge
them as purebred and remember the 5 generation purity rule, any dogs registered
that month would be
DQ'd and all future offspring
wouldn't be eligible for registration.
How could they tell what
is a merle in the first place when they're all registered as roan anyway?
Send a rep to every person's
home for on eyeball on every dog that is registered as a roan?
LOL, not gonna happen.
They are safe.
My
personal opinion is that the sables got thrown out..not because of the
color..but a personal vendetta against a well-know sable breeder.
Now guess what she is breeding
now? Right! Very nice roans. How "convenient" it would be to suddenly disallow
the roans (personal vendetta here again) because of an argument that
people can't tell the difference between them and merles!!! Catch my drift?
ASC IMO, isn't going to do a damn thing about this issue because it would
be "killing 2 birds" with one stone.
So yes, we DO need to work
at getting AKC to register merles as merles, whether we like them, or approve
of them or not.
You
have to remember the mindset of ASC. To them, there are only 4 acceptable
colors- buff, black, r/w and b/w. If browns came to the mainstream during
the age of the internet, I bet you they'd have had a real hard time, too,
not that they didn't. It's an "old school" board and they don't like change.
Some of the old-timer's don't even like partis, lol.
I also think they don't
even want to acknowledge the existence of merles, legit or not, doesn't
matter to them.
The "Pandora's Box" opened
with the arrival of the sudden boom in merle breeding, not whether ASC
can or even should add the color.
Now, they have a REAL good
excuse to dismiss roan and sable. If you can't tell a merle from a roan
or sable, how do you know they ALL aren't?? See the danger here and how
easy it would be for them to slide that right on past everyone?
I say we MAKE them
acknowledge the difference before it's too late and NOTHING can be done
but idly sit and wait for them to vote on the sable issue again, only this
time it will be the sable and roan issue, I'm afraid.

Please
understand this is not a witch hunt, it's a fact finding mission, all opinions
are welcome and with discussion comes knowledge,
I have had sables since
79, so I have been thru the wars! and I believe this is a free country,
people have the right to do as their conscience dictates, I'm very proud
of my sables and will defend them until I'm no longer here to do it.
But Merle is a Health risk,
and we don't need more problems in our breed, IF I had seen 1 , even 1
health trait that the sable brought into the gene pool I would have stopped
breeding them in an instant!
It is our fear that people
who do not know what they are, and doesn't have a clue about the genetics
will be pairing them up and we will have disasters.
I have seen this in
a litter if shelties here in our local pound they were dropped off because
the whole litter has different degrees of blindness hearing loss or both
, it just broke my heart they were so sweet but ours is not a no kill shelter,!
do you think they will be adopted!

Ok,
so saying your theory is correct and this woman did in fact bring in a
different breed into the cocker fold, with it's beauty and problems all
in one package...how many years ago has this been? Also how many
generations of purebred cockers brought back into the mix?
Our present day cockers came
to be because of other dogs bred into their pedigrees years ago...and when
I say years, am talking maybe 100 or more. If I am not mistaken a
spaniel who is now extinct was part of this too..
Doesn't that make this merle
gene then after so many generations something that has become part of the
dog no matter how it was introduced?
Not saying it wasn't a mutation..just
giving both sides of this issue the benefit of the doubt..
My thoughts are ok, we figured
out the (maybe) how and why...so now since it is here, how do we teach
John Q. Public the dangers and responsibilities of these dogs?
Wouldn't it be better to
try to work with all these "unique" cocker breeders, not putting them down,
but having them agree to spay/neuter any dogs they sell...thereby keeping
those who don't have a clue on genetics or the problem from breeding what
they get with those potential problems?
Learning is one of the best
things we humans do..and if we approach people with our concerns, am hoping
that anyone who really cares would listen.

I'm
surprised at all the controversy surrounding this color.
Well,
here goes. I own a merle and this is what I can tell you about him.
His coat is undesirable in that it is coarse and brittle. He has recurring
skin problems (open sores) and runny eyes and is contstantly being treated
with antibiotics. He has produced some beautiful puppies early on
but occassionally some of his offspring will end up with horriffic bites.
I was told I was purchasing a ROAN but the breeder I bought him from did
not know the difference between merle and roan. I also traced
his pedigree back to a puppy mill in missouri. Having said
all that, please don't persecute me because what I can also tell you is
that he is one of THE sweetest cockers I have ever encountered. It's
quite heartbreaking.
He is being
neutered monday.

|